I  U  P  A  C

 News & Notices

Minutes of 126th Meeting of Executive Committee
24-25 April 1999, Tokyo, Japan


6. VICE PRESIDENTIAL CRITICAL ASSESSMENT
In the absence of Dr. Hayes, Prof. Jortner reviewed Dr. Hayes' draft Vice President's critical assessment. He noted that the principle of complementarity had been observed. That is, the current VPCA covers those aspects of the Union not covered in the previous VPCA. Prof. Jortner also noted the receipt of a report from Dr. Hayes on his participation in the recent meeting of the International Council of Chemical Associations (ICCA).

The Committee expressed its appreciation for Dr. Hayes' report, which raised significant issues regarding the future role of IUPAC with regard to the global chemical industry as well as IUPAC's leadership role in promoting international cooperation in the chemical sciences.

Subsequent discussion noted the need to expand the contacts already made to cover the trade associations representing the pharmaceutical, agricultural and biotechnology industry. The concerns of these industries should be taken into account in the activities of COCI, CHEMRAWN, and the Committee on the Teaching of Chemistry.

Prof. Jortner will convey a summary of the specific points raised in the discussion to the Vice President for his consideration in preparing the final version of the VPCA for submission to the Bureau and Council in Berlin.

7. APPROVAL OF DIVISION PLANS FOR DIVISION COMMITTEES AND NOMINATING COMMITTEES
Dr. Becker briefly described the plans of the Divisions for implementation of the recommendations of the SDIC, as approved by the Bureau, for selection of nominees for Division Committees by Nominating Committees that included outside members. Divisions I through V have submitted plans that were summarized for the Executive Committee in the Agenda book. The plans for Divisions VI and VII are not yet complete. Dr. Becker emphasized the need to provide the Divisions the necessary flexibility to adapt the Bureau's recommendations to the situation of each Division. The Committee noted the importance of communication with the membership of the Division by the officers of the Division regarding the plans of the Division for implementation of the recommendations of the Bureau.

Prof. Fischli reported that Prof. Schmid had written to notify the Union that he would be stepping down as Chairman of the Committee on Biotechnology at the end of 1999. He has proposed Prof. Milton Hearn as a suitable replacement. The group discussed the possibility of recommending to the Bureau at Berlin that the programs of the Committee on Biotechnology be incorporated into Division III, with Prof. Hearn becoming a member of the Division Committee. There was also some discussion of a possible name change for Division III to Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry or to Organic Chemistry and Biotechnology. The Division President is reluctant to employ a name that appears to claim "ownership" of a broad area such as biomolecular chemistry but would be happy to incorporate "bioorganic" into the name of the Division. The sense of the Committee was that a name change was not necessary at this time, and the question can be discussed by the Bureau before asking Council for any necessary action.

Dr. Becker noted that there were a number of Subcommittees and Working Parties in the Divisions that will formally continue to exist, even if the Council does not reapprove Commissions after 2001. The Committee agreed that the Secretary General should write to the Division Presidents asking them to consider carefully the necessity for each Subcommittee and Working Party. It was felt that some of these groups could be converted to Task Groups working on a project; if others need to be retained for longer range activities, they could be reestablished with updated terms of reference and with a specific time limit for termination or consideration for further extension.

The need for flexibility regarding the length of the terms of service of Commission TMs and Officers for the next two years was noted by the Committee. Prof. Steyn was asked to discuss the plans of Division VI with Dr. Miyamoto. Prof. Jortner and Prof. Fischli will discuss the situation of Division VII with Prof. Wermuth.

8. STRATEGIC PLAN

8.1 IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

Dr. Becker reviewed the document summarizing implementation of the Strategic Plan by the Divisions and Standing Committees. He noted that this summary was based on separate reports from each Division and Standing Committee, which had been condensed and combined to form a coherent report of the Union's activities in terms of the Strategic Plan. The Committee felt that this report was a valuable part of the planning process and should be part of the material distributed to the Council. Dr. Przybylowicz agreed to undertake the editing of the report to produce two versions, one suitable for distribution to the Council and the other for use in publicizing the work of the Union to outside organizations. The suggestion was made that the Strategic Plan should appear in future editions of the Handbook

8.2 UPDATING

The National Adhering Organizations have been requested to provide proposed changes to the Strategic Plan by 15 June. The Division Presidents will also be asked for suggested changes by the same date.

9. RESTRUCTURING

9.1 COMMENTS RECEIVED

The Committee noted with thanks the comments received from organizations and individuals. The comment received from the Slovak National Committee will be included as a proposal under Item 18 of the Council Agenda.

9.2 LETTERS TO NAOS REGARDING RESTRUCTURING

Dr. Becker commented that it would be important to address the concerns of individual NAOs before the Council meeting, since the Council meeting was not a good forum for detailed discussion of a complicated proposal. Dr. Przybylowicz noted that it was important to emphasize the open nature of the discussions that had led to the proposals approved by the Bureau and to be considered by the Council. Dr. Becker was asked to draft a letter which would summarize the background of the proposed changes and explain the actions that had already been taken by the Bureau and how the actions proposed to the Council fit into the overall proposed new system of managing the Union's scientific work.

9.3 BYLAW CHANGES AND OTHER COUNCIL ACTIONS

Dr. Becker briefly reviewed the proposed bylaw change regarding the entitlement of Titular Members to support for attendance at General Assemblies and the Council resolution not continuing Commissions past 2001.

9.4 RESULTS OF USNC/IUPAC SURVEY

Dr. Przybylowicz briefly described the results of a survey of US members of IUPAC bodies and an open meeting held at the ACS Convention in Anaheim, California. The results of the survey were in general positive. There were a number of concerns expressed by some members regarding the need to ensure continuity in moving to a project based system.

10. NEW PROJECT APPROVAL SYSTEM
Dr. Jost briefly described the steps that had been taken to begin operation of the new project approval system. Project proposals are being received and distributed to Division Committees, reviews are being requested and projects have been submitted to the Project Committee. The Committee asked the Treasurer and the Secretary General to continue to approve the expenditure of funds for small projects that have been approved by Division Committees but which the Divisions do not have the resources to fund.

10.1 PROPOSALS FOR ICSU GRANTS

Dr. Jost noted that one project had been submitted to ICSU in the > USD 50 000 category and three in the < USD 50 000 category. It was noted that the quality of the proposals received had improved from last year due to the use of a standard form proposed by the Committee on Project Evaluation Criteria. Prof. Fischli described the modified plans for the Biodiversity project that were developed at the recent meeting in Amsterdam. Prof. Jortner noted the support of IUPAC for this project and the willingness of the Union to provide seed money in advance of ICSU funding approval.


Back to the Index


Home - News & Notices - Organizations & People - Standing Committees - Divisions
Projects - Recommendations - Publications - Symposia/Conferences - Links - AMP


Page last modified 8 June 1999.
Copyright © 1997, 98, 99 International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry.

Questions or comments about IUPAC
please contact the Secretariat.
Questions regarding the website
please contact Web Help.